tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33399132.post2558835597218571148..comments2024-03-04T08:09:21.453-08:00Comments on Richard's Real Estate and Urban Economics Blog: SillinessRichard Greenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02161226214739034402noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33399132.post-20082371983744420642010-08-13T08:54:42.732-07:002010-08-13T08:54:42.732-07:00Depends upon what you mean by "save". Sa...Depends upon what you mean by "save". Save economically, obviously not.<br /><br />On the other hand, save aesthetically, maybe. Vast stretches of vacant lots, trash, collapsing buildings, and ailanthus are a lot less appealing than stretches of fruit trees and vegetables. I don't think there is much doubt that there are large parts of Detroit that would be much improved by some agricultural use, as otherwise they have no use.Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09402238078390707450noreply@blogger.com