tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33399132.post8325213022572942421..comments2024-03-04T08:09:21.453-08:00Comments on Richard's Real Estate and Urban Economics Blog: A couple of thoughts on the passing of Steve JobsRichard Greenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02161226214739034402noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33399132.post-89908868333661571702012-11-15T21:15:58.355-08:002012-11-15T21:15:58.355-08:00So keep in mind that if you are simply listening t...So keep in mind that if you are simply listening to get more interest than the bank will ever give you then Tax Liens are the great choice and if you love controlling the property and being property owner is your ambition then Tax deeds are the best one. <a href="http://vimeo.com/34500527" title="DAVID LINDAHL" rel="nofollow">DAVID LINDAHL</a> says that, Tax Lien or Tax Deed? This query occurs a lot among traders eager in Tax crime real estate investment.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03157123148198604033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33399132.post-91262395805247366262011-10-11T05:24:56.629-07:002011-10-11T05:24:56.629-07:00The case of Steve Jobs seems to me to be evidence ...The case of Steve Jobs seems to me to be evidence that taxing any of the rich will lower productivity.The social returns to Steve Jobs must be remarkable.<a href="http://www.livelasramblas.com/" rel="nofollow">doral real estate</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33399132.post-61620631308262186122011-10-08T15:38:22.435-07:002011-10-08T15:38:22.435-07:00Jobs apparently did not give much to charity, and ...Jobs apparently did not give much to charity, and it seems likely that he planned his estate so as to minimize taxes and leave his money to his family. (see http://www.forbes.com/sites/trialandheirs/2011/10/07/steve-jobs-appears-to-have-protected-his-estate-with-living-trusts/ and http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/07/the-history-of-steve-jobs_n_998325.html)<br /><br />As you say, Jobs created large social returns. He also seems to have been significantly motivated by what he could bequeath to his family. You would like to distinguish between the "productive rich" and non-productive rich, but the non-productive rich are mostly heirs of the productive rich. The case of Steve Jobs seems to me to be evidence that taxing any of the rich will lower productivity.David Barkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17243910374364993035noreply@blogger.com