Thursday, September 20, 2012

Ed Glaeser weighs in

He advocates neutrality:


The government should neither encourage nor discourage home-ownership. Significant public interventions require evidence of significant market failure, and confidence that the costs of state action will be less than the costs of those market failures. These conditions are not met in the housing sector, whether we are contemplating pro or anti home-ownership policies. 
The case for home-ownership often begins with the view that home-owners are better citizens, who create social benefits by investing more in their communities and their governments. My work with Denise DiPasquale does find that home-owners are more likely to work to solve local problems, to vote and to know the names of local leaders. These effects reflect both home-owners' stake in their community and their tendency to live in one place longer. 


6 comments:

  1. Richard, you put this trade-off between market failure costs and public intervention costs in a very straightforward way. Good. I'm trying to figure out, though, what evidence/data could attest a market failure in the housing sector? A significant percentage of households located in slums, lacking tenure security, etc. ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:08 PM

    Hi, I found your post really helpful. It helped me all the way in completing my assignment; I am also giving a reference link of your blog in my case study. Thanks for posting such informative content. Keep posting
    TDI Builder in Mohali

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous1:16 AM

    Your post is too good mr richard

    City center sector-32 Noida

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice post.it will be very interesting and informative to us.
    dave lindahl

    ReplyDelete
  5. Apartment - An individual istanbul real estate
    unit in a multi-unit building. The boundaries of the apartment are generally defined by istanbul real estate a perimeter of locked or lockable doors. Often seen in multi-story apartment buildings.

    ReplyDelete