Sunday, May 02, 2010

What Milton Friedman got wrong

Friedman had two fundamental problems with business regulation. His first is that the business would capture the regulator, and therefore use regulation to establish monopoly power. My field leads me to find this line of argument compelling: real estate developers love (regulatory) barriers to entry that keep competitors from building.

His second, though, is just wrong. He argues that in order to preserve their reputations, businesses will self-regulate. Among other things, this ignores that managers often have short-term horizons. It also ignores that when large businesses implode, they leave victims with whom they never engaged in a transaction in their wake. BP did nothing illegal--how's that reputation thing working out? And having now read a whole lot on Goldman-Abacus (including the SEC complaint, the response on GS's web site, the offering circular, and excellent commentary from James Surowiecki, Yves Smith and others), it is not clear to me that Goldman did anything illegal or actionable (but I could be persuaded to change my mind). It is just that what it did (including investing long in CDS) should be unambiguously illegal and actionable. I can't think of anyone who had a bigger reputation franchise than Goldman.

15 comments:

Unknown said...

That was really interesting article. I liked the way you have explained problem of friedman. I would like to see something more like this.
credit card for bad credit

Unknown said...

kitchener homes for sale

The article is good provides useful information Friedman two fundamental problems with business regulation.Hope to see more of such articles.

Richard H. Serlin said...

"His first is that the business would capture the regulator"

We have a long history of regulation still doing far more good than harm. Look at banking regulation post depression until the recent Republican dismantling. Look at anti-pollution regulation. Look at product safety regulation.

Plus, this problem could easily be obliterated with an amendment banning business political spending, or public campaign financing so generous that there's little incentive to cater to businesses for their money.

David Barker said...

Neither regulators nor markets are good with rare, catastrophic events. When they don't happen, we become complacent. When they do, we overreact.

Reputation, not regulation, is why most products are safe. Regulators can't possibly police everyone - firms make good products voluntarily to build reputation.

Wall Street is different - due diligence is expected. Anyone who bought from Goldman out of trust deserves to go out of business.

Milton Friedman got it right!

Richard Green said...

Except, David, that it would have taken a $500,000 backup switch to prevent the accident--and government regulators did see this coming. They were preventing from acting.

Sometimes I think you didn't just imbibe the Chicago Kool-aid--you were hooked up to an IV drip!

David Barker said...

MMS was "prevented from acting" by being captured. They raised concerns to get attention, were lobbied, and backed off. According to the NYT, regulators “frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana, and had sexual relationships with oil and gas company representatives.”

Before MMS was established in 1982 the US Geological Survey significantly undercharged oil companies for royalties for many years. I once wrote a paper on federal royalty income and the data from those years were a complete mess.

Regulatory capture is bi-partisan and long-standing.

Kool-Aid comes in different flavors. I tasted them all at LSE, Berkeley, and Chicago, but it took a few years in business to learn the truth about government, taxes, and incentives.

Beverly said...

i agree... this article is really informative.

North Back Packs

luciyahelan said...

Realy, Hat’s off. Well done, as we know that “hard work always pays off”, after a long struggle with sincere effort it’s done. This action proof to be a win, win situation. This is a true art
work, which will be a success story.There’s usually a good bunch of talent nominated- they just don’t usually win.
=====================================
Real Estate

luciyahelan said...

Reputation, not regulation, is why most products are safe. Regulators can't possibly police everyone - firms make good products voluntarily to build reputation.

Wall Street is different - due diligence is expected. Anyone who bought from Goldman out of trust deserves to go out of business.
=============================
Real Estate

led said...

Christian Louboutin Tall Boots
Christian Louboutin Wedges
Christian Louboutin Pumps
Christian Louboutin Sandals
Jimmy Choo Shoes
Moncler Kid's Jackets
Moncler clothing wholesale
Wholesale Moncler Jackets
discount Moncler Jackets
http://www.shopmoncler.hk/moncler-jackets
http://www.utsource.net/BUK444-500B.html
http://www.utsource.net/MG50Q6ES41.html
http://www.utsource.net/UM150CDY-10.html
http://www.utsource.net/MP7002.html
http://www.utsource.net/TMS320F2812PGFA.html
http://www.utsource.net/CEM3374.html
http://www.utsource.net/2sj74.html

GHD Hair Straightener said...

Uggs are sheepskin boots.Babyliss Hair Straightener What this means is they are able to keep the ft dry and warm. Mostly utilized in cold nations, they've gain popularity around the globe. The sturdy stitch and soles helps make the boot durable.Ugg Classic Boots The outside area of the boot consists of fleece-like sheepskin material whereas the inside consists of made of woll.Ugg Classic Boots the lifeline from the Uggs dates back towards the year 1971 when Uggs-N-Area rugs first made and begin selling due to the fact. Initially viewers accustomed to put on due to the fact.gh uk The beach residents and viewers known as them ughs, ugly boots or simply the ughs in a nutshell. It's been thought that Uggs were worn initially on Alarms Beach in Victoria.Ugg Boots Outlet However, now Uggs have grown to be an worldwide logo and is worn both in winters and summer season.Ugg Boots Outlet Uggs-N-Area rugs around 2003 offered his company also it was just since that time the boots grew to become popular within the worldwide market. These come in plenty on the market.UGG Outlet Many online retailers sell the fake boots but go ahead and take same cost like this from the original ones.uggs clearance If you value the company Ugg you'd certainly not mind having to pay more with this brand.Ugg Online Store Is not it? Thus fake ones certainly mustn't become your choice.ugg classic boots The Australian made genuine Uggs are particularly produced from top quality materials.Cheap Ugg UK Furthermore they can undergo a comprehensive procedure of dying, cleaning, cutting as well as conditioning of sheepskin. The fake boots that are created to seem like the initial Uggs are constructed with poor textures and synthetic soles.Discount Uggs Boots So, before shopping your boots from Ugg online, perform a little more searching to discover which online shop provides a genuine set of Ugg boot.Uggs are available in different colours. So, the very best factor relating to this boot is you can choose the color of your liking when purchasing due to the fact. gh uk
Ugg Classic Boots
Ugg Classic Boots
Babyliss Hair Straightener
Ghd Australia

Knox Karter said...

Nice information, many thanks to the author. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck!

Buy A Ready-Made Logo

justin albert said...

Thanks for your great post.I like this very much, please write more about these,wait for your update

Facebook Fan Page Developer

Frank Martin said...

yes
that is really great post,
but remove the spamming comments from your blogs.

Facebook Application Developers

Anonymous said...

I have no words to express how useful your blog was to me in completing my job work successful. Thanks a lot.

Facebook Fan Page Developer