Thursday, October 16, 2008

I was wrong about Karl Rove

I used to think he was an evil genius. An item in his WSJ column this morning undermines the genius part. He writes:

The Investor's Business Daily/TIPP poll (which was closest to the mark in predicting the 2004 outcome -- 0.4% off the actual result) now says this is a three-point race.

Before he wrote this, I thought Rove understood data. But polls are (more-or-less) random samples, and a group of pools will produce a distribution of outcomes. It is of course the case that one poll will come closest to the population outcome; the fact that a particular poll does says nothing about the skill of the pollster. Now, if one pollster comes closest ten times in a row, we can be sure that something real is going on--that she has insights about sampling that the others don't. But one correct call is nothing but luck.

Every quarter, the Wall Street Journal picks a "best economic forecaster," which is based on close an economist's forecast to predicting economic conditions in a quarter. Check out how well that forecaster does in the following quarter. If you made any decisions based on who wins the award for one quarter, you may well be disappointed in the following quarter.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

It is must to know the answer for the question, what is the value of the asset in your local real estate market? If you don’t know the answer means just search for the clues by using the David Lindahl scam report. As the property values are changing day by day in a fast manner, you need to be aware of knowing the sale valve of the property. In this unstable world it is not a big thing for the property value to oscillate from $16000 to $25000 in a period of month. In case you buy a property and you thing to sell it then you can either lose or gain several amount of currency almost. So get more info about the current real estate property sale rate.