The past few days have brought encomiums to and reflections of the work and life of James Q. Wilson (see here for example). But I have yet to see anything about Wilson the teacher.
When I was 17 years old, I took Government 30, American Government, from Wilson, Sydney Verba and H. Douglas Price. The whole course was good, but I found Wilson to be an awe-inspiring figure. He behaved the way I thought a Harvard professor was supposed to be--he was elegant, he had an easy-to-listen-to voice, and despite the fact that we had been a national champion debater, he never spoke too quickly or aggressively.
Both the style and substance of his lectures were memorable. Leonard Bernstein once wrote of Beethoven that has never had a note out of place--every note followed inevitably from the previous note. The same was true with Wilson and words. The prose coming out of his mouth was flawless, but never flowery. I remember that some of my classmates didn't like this--they deemed the polish to be slickness. To me, however, the pristineness of his language meant that it never detracted from the substance he was communicating. His lectures were also models of organization and clarity; as such, he made sophisticated ideas easy to grasp.
Because I was a 17 year old naive liberal from Wisconsin (a state once known for clean government and progressive traditions), I came to college thinking that people got involved in government because they wanted to do good. Wilson managed to convey the idea that bureaucrats, members of congress and interest groups often behaved in, well, their own interests. This may seem obvious, but it was actually a bit of a bolt out of the blue for me at the time. But the great thing is that he conveyed these "conservative" sentiments without demeaning the idea that there is a role for idealism in government.
When I was 17 years old, I took Government 30, American Government, from Wilson, Sydney Verba and H. Douglas Price. The whole course was good, but I found Wilson to be an awe-inspiring figure. He behaved the way I thought a Harvard professor was supposed to be--he was elegant, he had an easy-to-listen-to voice, and despite the fact that we had been a national champion debater, he never spoke too quickly or aggressively.
Both the style and substance of his lectures were memorable. Leonard Bernstein once wrote of Beethoven that has never had a note out of place--every note followed inevitably from the previous note. The same was true with Wilson and words. The prose coming out of his mouth was flawless, but never flowery. I remember that some of my classmates didn't like this--they deemed the polish to be slickness. To me, however, the pristineness of his language meant that it never detracted from the substance he was communicating. His lectures were also models of organization and clarity; as such, he made sophisticated ideas easy to grasp.
Because I was a 17 year old naive liberal from Wisconsin (a state once known for clean government and progressive traditions), I came to college thinking that people got involved in government because they wanted to do good. Wilson managed to convey the idea that bureaucrats, members of congress and interest groups often behaved in, well, their own interests. This may seem obvious, but it was actually a bit of a bolt out of the blue for me at the time. But the great thing is that he conveyed these "conservative" sentiments without demeaning the idea that there is a role for idealism in government.
2 comments:
On the whole, real estate investing is a risky task, having a real estate expert while framing a decision is a wise idea. There are several real estate gurus’ who will help you in framing the right decision. DAVID LINDAHL is one such great real estate connoisseur who can help the frame the right decision at right time.
The size of an apartment or house can be istanbul real estate described in
square feet or meters. In the United States, this includes the area of "living space", excluding the garage and
other istanbul property non-living spaces. The "square meters" figure of a
house in Europe may report the total area of istanbul properties the walls
enclosing the home, thus including any attached garage and non-living spaces, which makes it important to inquire what kind of surface
definition has been istanbul real estate used.
It can be described more roughly istanbul real estate
the number of rooms. A studio apartment has a single bedroom with istanbul real estate
no living room (possibly a separate kitchen). A one-bedroom apartment for sale in istanbul
apartment has a living or dining room separate house for sale in istanbul
from the bedroom. Two bedroom, istanbul villa three bedroom, and larger
units are common. (A bedroom is defined as a room with a closet for istanbul villa clothes storage.)
In recent years, property for sale in turkey many
economists have recognized that the lack of property for sale in istanbul
effective real estate property for sale in istanbul
laws can be a significant barrier to investment in many developing countries.
In most societies, land for sale in istanbul rich and
poor, a significant fraction of the total land for sale in turkey
wealth is in the form of land and buildings.
Post a Comment