Saturday, August 22, 2009

How the world likely views arguments among academics

I am guessing that, to the extent that it cares, the broader world sees the current argument between Richard Posner, on one side, and Paul Krugman, Brad Delong, Mark Thoma and Menzie Chinn, on the other, as some sort of esoteric pissing contest. This is because all of these people are very smart and write very well.

The problem is that Posner is just plain wrong--I mean, he gets his arithmetic wrong in so many ways, it is breathtaking. For instance, he doesn't understand the difference between a quarterly growth rate and a quarterly annualized growth rate. This does not particularly surprise me--very good lawyers are often not good at math. One of my dearest friends is a brilliant lawyer (and political analyst), and he couldn't calculate a present value if his life depended on it. He was also amazed that one had to strip the casing off of speaker wire before one hooked up a stereo. The other thing about lawyers is they are not particularly good at admitting when they are wrong--their entire training teaches them not to do so (although the friend I just mentioned is endearingly modest).

In the current context, this is a problem, because Posner is hurling ad hominems [h/t to William Adelman for correcting the spelling] while not knowing what he is talking about.

8 comments:

rjs said...

you're right! if i told my friends that Richard Posner, on one side, and Paul Krugman, Brad Delong, Mark Thoma and Menzie Chin on the other were having an arguement on the blogs, almost all would say "who?"; thats why i will never link to this type of article...

Uncle Billy vs. Mont Pelerin said...

This could work on television...

A reality show. We drop everyone on an island for a week and film them to see which ideas survive.

Anonymous said...

Taiwan's flooding caused by the disaster, let us love to play together to help those in need of help, and now you need to do is click on any one keyword for each link will be sponsored by the NT one dollar, let us work together to create world peace ~ thank you!

台灣這次受到洪水侵襲造成巨大災難,讓我們發揮愛心一起幫助這些需要幫助的人,現在你只要每點擊任何一個關鍵字連結,將會得到新台幣一元的贊助,讓我們一起共同創造世界和平~感謝您!

旅遊 法拍屋 服飾
婦產科 大陸外籍新娘 新娘
納豆保健食品 瑜珈教室
彌月蛋糕 汽車旅館MOTEL 台中住宿
清潔公司 法拍屋 看護
隔熱紙 seo 網路行銷
整形外科 看護 整形
室內設計 系統傢俱 網頁設計
柴犬 哈士奇 網頁設計
防爆工具 瑜珈 機票

drschweitzer said...

I don't think academics are particularly good at admitting when we're wrong. Our training doesn't favor that either, and our publication-media-seeking behavior favors positive results rather than negative results, so disproving is way harder than it probably should be.

Richard K. Green said...

Fair point, Lisa. Although we are supposed to respect evidence--even if it contradicts what we once thought.

residential real estate said...

You got a point there!!!

William Adelman said...

One more correction:

"...Posner is hurling ad hominems..." [h/t to William Adelman for correcting the spelling while not knowing what he is talking about.]

Anonymous said...

對於想要讓自己變美的您,建炳診所提出以下建議:

1.整形前一定要選擇合法的醫療院所及合格專業的整形外科專科醫師,不要以價錢為依據,拿自己的身體當試驗品。

2.整形手術前一定要與醫師充分的溝通,因為美是主觀的,所以表達什麼是你想要的型態是讓整形成功的重要因素。

3.整形手術前如果未達法定年齡18歲,就需要徵求父母的同意,由爸爸媽媽陪同一起接受諮詢及診療。

本診所提供最完整的整形各項手術如:微整形雙眼皮隆乳隆鼻抽脂五爪拉皮眼袋除疤自體脂肪移植玻尿酸整形…等。歡迎進入網站瀏覽或親洽建炳整形外科診所洽詢。

整形拉皮電波拉皮抽脂雙眼皮玻尿酸脂肪移植除疤隆乳隆鼻眼袋果凍矽膠>>>參考網站